I fear if I ask this question on Puritanboard I will be banned, so I will ask it here.
If persons = relations, as Thomas says, then does the converse hold:
(P1) Relations = Persons
This raises the next question:
(P2) Is now the relation between the person yet another person?
If you keep repeating this you have the infinite hypostases of Gnosticism.
If persons = relations, as Thomas says, then does the converse hold:
(P1) Relations = Persons
This raises the next question:
(P2) Is now the relation between the person yet another person?
If you keep repeating this you have the infinite hypostases of Gnosticism.